decemberthirty: (goldfish and palette)
2007-08-28 04:22 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I finished Michael Chabon's The Yiddish Policemen's Union just over a week ago. I liked it, but I wouldn't call it a great book. Better than Wonder Boys, not as good as Kavalier and Clay. It's a fun read, but not quite as fun as it seems a detective novel should be. I don't know why that is. Chabon certainly seems to have enjoyed himself in writing the book, but perhaps his enjoyment actually precludes the full enjoyment of the reader--he allows himself to wallow just a bit too much in noirish trope, adds a few too many rhetorical flourishes, allows his plot to get a smidgen too outlandish. It's neat to watch him play, but I never felt like I was fully included in the game.

Even though it's not a perfect book, there are many things that Chabon does well. Primary among those is his depiction of the relationship between Meyer Landsman and his ex-wife Bina. At first I was a little annoyed by the predictability of this relationship--of course the bitter alcoholic detective has problems with women, of course he's not over the failure of his troubled marriage--but my attitude softened after I read a few of the conversations between them, particularly a chance late-night encounter in a nearly deserted cafeteria. (It's a lovely scene, but see what I mean about the noirish tropes?) The scene is touching because Chabon does such a good job conjuring the kinds of things people say to each other when love still exists but a future together doesn't. It was nice to have such a humanizing moment in a book as full of caricature as this one.

Chabon also, as always, does a fantastic job with language in this book. He demonstrates a flawless sense of rhythm and tone, both in the characters' speech and in the narrative passages. There are moments when his elaborate metaphors and roundabout sentences get in the way of his story, but for every instance like that, there are two more when his writing is absolutely spot-on and perfect, as when he describes the night over Sitka as having "the translucence of onions cooked in chicken fat." I mean, how clutch is that? Not only does it accurately capture the look of an urban night, it also connects with the overall Jewishness of the book and with Landsman's strictly unromantic view of the world. I love it.

I've read at least one review of this book that talked about how, in this moment with its insatiable appetite for memoir and the confessional sort of 'semi-autobiographical' fiction, The Yiddish Policemen's Union is refreshing because it is purely and unabashedly imaginary--an interesting idea to consider.

One of the most fascinating imaginary elements of this book for me was Chabon's use of setting. He does a great job creating, populating, and evoking his Jewish settlement in Alaska, but I wonder why he chose it. The setting doesn't seem to be tied to the story in any sort of essential way. He might just as well have dreamed up a Jewish territory in the desert of New Mexico. The details of weather and landscape would have been different and the Indians living next door would have been Navajo rather than Tlingit, but the story could have existed unchanged in just about any setting. [[livejournal.com profile] zenithblue, if you happen to read this book, I'd love to know whether you agree with me. It's possible that, being born and raised in Alaska, you could pick up on something inherently Alaskan about the book that I missed or didn't understand.]

So. It's a good book. Worth reading, although I could have done with a somewhat more believable plot and a slightly more satisfying resolution. It definitely leaves me curious about what Chabon will do next.
decemberthirty: (Default)
2007-05-15 04:37 pm

Reading, reading, and more reading

On Sunday, I finished reading my book club's most recent selection, Go Tell It on the Mountain by James Baldwin. What a powerfully written book! Every sentence rings with passion and anger. I loved the writing. Baldwin has a tremendous sense of rhythm; that, coupled with his nearly biblical diction, lends tremendous force to his story. I can hardly believe that Baldwin was only 27 when he wrote this. The book is so self-assured, so confident in its own power and seemingly so unconcerned with audience that it seems like it should have been written by an author much more established in his career. At the same time, much of the story comes straight from Baldwin’s own experience, and in that the book seems like the soul cry of a very young man, a man who must burn a path through his history before he can move forward. Baldwin himself said that, “Go Tell It on the Mountain is the book I had to write if I was ever going to write anything else,” and reading it I can see the truth in that statement.

Go Tell It on the Mountain was a book that I admired rather than enjoyed. I could appreciate John’s tremendous struggle with religious belief, but I could never truly feel the anguish it caused him. The part of the book that I liked best was the middle section, “The Prayers of the Saints,” in which the stories of John’s mother, father, and aunt are told. I love the way, halfway through the book, Baldwin uses this section to reveal the secrets that everyone has been carrying: their old hurts, their undisclosed guilt, the wrongs they’ve done or think they’ve done, the things they’ll never speak of to each other or to John. I also found these stories remarkable because, after hearing so much about the great faith and religious conviction of these characters, we suddenly see the extent to which each of them has been damaged by religion. In many ways, Go Tell It on the Mountain seems like a dark counterpart to Gilead. Where Gilead was all about the quiet uplifting power of faith, about religious belief as a source of sustenance in one’s life, this book shows the other side: the power of religion to condemn, to isolate, to foster guilt, secrecy, and hypocrisy.

So. A powerful book and a thought-provoking book, but not an emotionally engaging book. I wonder if I would feel differently about that if my own experiences were closer to those described in the book.

And now for something completely different…

In addition to Go Tell It on the Mountain, last week I also read the final installment of “Gentlemen of the Road,” Michael Chabon’s serialized adventure story that has been running in the New York Times Magazine for the past few months. I loved it. I’m not sure how well it would work if you read it all at once like a novel (or a novella, actually; it’s not very long), but it works beautifully as a serial. Each chapter was perfectly calibrated for maximum drama every week, and the story was stuffed full of swashbuckling chaos: swordfights! Elephants! Assassinations! Whorehouses! Secret identities! Daring rescues! Grizzled old warriors and revenge plots and cliffhanger after cliffhanger after cliffhanger—everything you could ask for in a story of this kind. At first I found the style off-putting, with its gargantuan sentences and high-falutin’ vocabulary, but once I got used to it I realized that it was just part of the fun. And fun is what the whole thing was. If the point of this was to get me excited for The Yiddish Policemen’s Union, it worked!

You can read the first chapter here, and you can find the rest by searching the NYT archives.

And now I’m reading The Swimming-Pool Library by Alan Hollinghurst. I started this a couple months ago, but put it down during the time when I was all stressed out over grad school decision making. I came back to it now because after a run of rather heavy reads (back-to-back books about the war in the Balkans, then a book about tyranny and oppression in Nigeria, then all the race and religion of Go Tell It on the Mountain) I was feeling ready for a book about gay men having sex with each other. I swear, this book is enough to make me concerned for the future of the human race, because in the world according to Hollinghurst, heterosexual men do not seem to exist.

Anyhow, the book concerns the absurdly overprivileged Will Beckwith, the grandson of a lord who has too much money to worry about working, so instead spends his days cavorting around London and trysting with men everywhere he goes. ([livejournal.com profile] moiethegreat: it suddenly occurs to me that you should recommend this book to Adam. Now what could have made me think of that?) Will quickly finds himself embroiled in two plotlines: one concerning his affair with a younger West Indian man who may be in trouble with the police, and one revolving around a doddering old lord whose life Will happens to save one day in Hyde Park. It is as yet unclear how these two stories connect to each other, but I suspect they will in time. The book moves along nicely and can be quite funny when it wants to be. I’m enjoying it quite a bit so far.
decemberthirty: (neon star)
2007-02-09 05:46 pm

Writing his name in water

I finished Wonder Boys this afternoon, and my feelings about it are decidedly mixed. I warmed up to it considerably after my initial post, but I still find myself unable to truly embrace the book. I was drawn in by an extended episode in the middle of the book when Grady Tripp goes to spend Passover with his wife's family in rural PA. It's unclear (Grady himself is not really sure) whether the trip is a last-ditch effort to save his marriage or an opportunity to end things once and for all, but it's really a lovely moment. Grady's uncertainty is rendered convincingly, the family's eccentricities, while perhaps more numerous than those of most families, are nonetheless believable, and the dynamic that exists among the family members seems very real: sometimes exasperated, sometimes truly hurt, but always underscored by palpable affection. This was the first moment when I felt that the book actually had a heart, that it was about more than just absurdity for absurdity's sake; the reading went better for me after that, but I never fully overcame my dislike.

I don't know why I was unable to truly like Wonder Boys. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that I've never been able to enjoy books or movies where you're forced to just sit back and watch someone fuck up over and over again--no matter how well things turn out in the end, I always find the experience uncomfortable. And, speaking of things turning out well in the end, I found the end of Wonder Boys rather unsatisfying. I find it very hard to believe that Grady is actually happy in his new life of fatherhood and good behavior. Maybe that's the problem with this book: Chabon has created an unresolvable story for himself. It's clear for 350 pages that Grady's life is untenable--he can't possibly go on living the way he's been living for 40+ years--yet Grady's faults and fuck-ups and flaws are so integral to our understanding of him as a character that any manner of reform rings false. Hmm, that could be it.

An odd tidbit about Wonder Boys: this book represents one of the very rare cases when I've seen the film adaptation of a book before I read it. I saw the Wonder Boys movie ages and ages ago--five years, at least. I had forgotten most of the plot details and all the important stuff, but the movie did have one strange effect on my reading: I couldn't stop hearing Tobey Maguire's voice saying all of James Leer's lines. At first the whole thing sounded a bit like Michael Douglas--that went away very quickly, but Tobey Maguire stayed. Weird!

Also, because I'm attempting to do a better job keeping track of the short fiction I read, I want to note that I recently read an excellent story: "The First Sense" by Nadine Gordimer, from the December 18th issue of the New Yorker. (Yeah, I'm way behind. Wanna make something of it?) The story, about the wife of a famous cellist, is a subtle study of enduring devotion. It's beautifully written and very short--just a tiny little luminous thing on the page.
decemberthirty: (egret)
2004-10-01 04:15 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I finished Werewolves in Their Youth a day or two ago, and my assessment remains pretty much the same: good, solid stories, but certainly not as good as Chabon's best work. I was unimpressed by the sameness of the collection. There were too many stories about depressed ex-husbands trying to figure out why their marriages had collapsed, or bored young couples trying to figure out why they had married each other in the first place. Not surprisingly, the stories that I liked best were the two that differed from that formula. "Spikes" does feature a depressed ex-husband but it's also about baseball, and if there's one thing Chabon can do, it's write about baseball. The last story in the book, "In the Black Mill" is by far the biggest departure. It's ostensibly authored by August van Zorn, who is apparently a very minor character who makes an appearance in Wonder Boys. Wonder Boys is the only Chabon novel I haven't read, so that didn't mean a whole lot to me other than the fact that, by writing in the voice of van Zorn, Chabon very consciously abandons his own usual style. The story is an old-fashioned sort of tale of suspense and horror, and Chabon demonstrates a surprising knack for that kind of writing. The story is just fun in a way that the rest of the stories in the book weren't.

And now I am reading Life of Pi by Yann Martel. Ms. E and others have told me that I ought to read it and I tend to like Booker winners, so my hopes are high. I have hardly read enough of it to comment, but it's been quite engaging so far...

In other news, Ms. E and I are housesitting this weekend, which means we're going to get paid a hundred dollars to spend the weekend living in a mansion with two chocolate labs. I can think of worse ways to make money. So here's a survey: what should we do with the hundred bucks?
decemberthirty: (egret)
2004-09-24 04:53 pm

(no subject)

I finished Set This House In Order, and it turned out to be pretty much trash after all. The first couple hundred pages went by quickly and fairly enjoyably, but after that I just got sick of all the characters and the plot started spiraling into absurdity. And Matt Ruff's prose style was serviceable at best, so that didn't help. I ended up finishing it quickly just to get it over with, and found the end to be ridiculously facile. I was interested in Ruff's attempt to write a first-person account of multiple personality disorder, but in the end I just found myself wondering if Ruff's depiction was anything like what life with MPD is really like. I would love to know what reaction, if any, the MPD community had to this book.

And now I'm reading Werewolves in Their Youth, a book of short stories by Michael Chabon. It's part of my ongoing quest to read everything that man has ever written or will ever write. The stories are very good, but so far I'm not as impressed with Chabon as a story writer as I am with Chabon as a novelist. The stories are all very much in the vein of Updike or Cheever. They all seem to deal with marriages that are in various stages of falling apart, boredom, financial trouble, things of that nature... Sort of suburbia lit. Chabon's eye for detail is spot-on and his ability to tap into the inner life of his characters is as sharp as ever, but I don't feel like he's stretching himself here the way he did in Kavalier and Clay or The Mysteries of Pittsburgh. I'm ever so slightly disappointed that the book does not live up to his best work, but when your best work is Kavalier and Clay, that's a hell of a lot to live up to. And even if the book is a tiny bit of a letdown, after reading Matt Ruff it's a pleasure just to read a writer how knows how to get so much out of language.
decemberthirty: (Default)
2004-07-07 05:05 pm

(no subject)

I finished Summerland last night. What a great read. Just pure fun from start to finish. Chabon's writing was great, as always, and it was interesting to see him try something so different from his other books. He did an amazing job with his young characters. They really seemed to think and talk like kids. I'm always impressed by that kind of thing, because it's something that I struggle with a lot in my own writing. That child-voice does not come very naturally to me. I also liked the book because, while it is certainly in the tradition of other young adult fantasy works (the quest, the motley band of characters, the battle between good and evil...), it's a lot more lighthearted than things like Susan Cooper's The Dark Is Rising, Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials, or LeGuin's Earthsea books. This is not to say that Summerland is better than those other books; I just liked the way Chabon took the same elements as those authors and, by using a totally different tone, created a book that feels very different. I don't think I'm doing a very good job of explaining myself.

Comparing Summerland to other books in its genre made my realize that it's once again getting to be time to read the Earthsea books, but I wanted to read something for adults before I dove right into it. So I started The Centaur by John Updike. I haven't read a whole lot of Updike beyond the Rabbit series and various short stories, but I thought the Rabbit books were really phenomenal and have been meaning to read more of him for some time. The Centaur was selected rather at random, just because I happened to find it in used bookstore a month or so ago. I am not really far enough along at this point to say much about it, aside from the fact that I find it strangely entrancing...
decemberthirty: (Default)
2004-04-08 12:59 pm

(no subject)

I finished Mysteries of Pittsburgh a few days ago. It seems rather slight when compared with Michael Chabon's later work, but I thought that it was really quite impressive for a debut novel. There's just something about the characters that makes it very easy to identify with them, despite the fact that their circumstances are ridiculous and their lifestyles are often blatantly unrealistic. I'm not sure that I really loved the way Chabon had Art deliver a kind of sum-it-all-up, moral-of-the-story type speech at the end, but all in all I thought it was quite well-written and gripping.

After finishing, I started Michael Shaara's The Killer Angels. I really should have read it back when I was twelve and in my extreme Civil War buff phase, but even now I'm finding it to be a great book. It's obviously very thoroughly researched, and Shaara does a great job of capturing the personalities and temperaments of these different men, and expressing the ways in which their individual natures influenced the course of the war. For some reason, the book is making me think about the way that certain names just evoke the history with which they are associated. The names of certain battles, certain men, just seem to kind of echo through the culture, and just by invoking those names you can call up strong emotions: Vicksburg, Shiloh, Antietam. The particular names at Gettysburg: Seminary ridge, the peach orchard, Pickett's charge... And the same can be said of the place names in other wars, at other times. I don't think I'm doing a good job of expressing what I mean.

My one little quibble with The Killer Angels so far, is the fact that the only people who are turned into fully fleshed-out characters are the officers. The ordinary soldiers who fill up the ranks are never even given names. Certainly when dealing with a subject as big as the battle of Gettysburg, an author has to be selective about he does and doesn't include, but it makes me wonder what Billy Prior would have to say about Shaara's exclusive focus on officers.
decemberthirty: (Default)
2004-04-02 01:51 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I started reading Michael Chabon's The Mysteries of Pittsburgh yesterday. It may not be Kavalier and Clay, but boy is it good! It was Chabon's first book, and his style seems slightly more self-conscious here, but I think that's to be expected in a first book. Also, it was written in the eighties, and definitely feels like a product of its time. I don't think it's dated, exactly, but there is just a sort of eighties-lit feel to it that I can't quite explain. Maybe little bit of a Jay McInerney influence or something like that.

Regardless of all of that stuff, I'm really enjoying the book. I don't know how Chabon, a married man with a family, got so good at writing these heartbreaking homosexual romances. My word. He just perfectly crystallizes that sense of longing between two men that slays me every time. For some reason, I seem to have been surrounded by male homosexuality lately: Kavalier and Clay, Yossi and Jagger, the Regeneration trilogy, and now this book, which I didn't even know had a gay theme at all! Anyhow, Chabon does a great job of conveying Art's conflicted feelings about Arthur.
decemberthirty: (Default)
2004-02-13 03:27 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I finished Kavalier and Clay yesterday. What a book! I don't know if there's anything I can really say about it other than that it is fantastic, absolutely deserving of its Pulitzer, and certainly one of the best books I have read in several years. I am now very interested in reading some of Chabon's other work to see how it compares. There are just so many aspects of Kavalier and Clay that blow me away. Chabon's prose is lively, intelligent, and versatile, and his characterization is just unbelievable. I reacted to the characters in this book in a way that reminds me of what I used to feel as a kid when I would read a book and wish so passionately that the characters were real so that I could talk to them and become their friend. I also really loved the way Chabon subtly subtly built up the unspoken sexual tension between Sammy and Tracy Bacon. Nothing was ever said openly, but by the time Bacon kissed Sammy in the Empire State Building, I was just aching for it to happen. That is an effect that I desperately want to create in my own book.

There are, of course, critical thoughts that I could be having about this book, intelligent remarks that I could make about what makes the book so effective, slight flaws that I could puzzle over, but I don't want to do any of that right now. I don't want to step back from it; I'm not ready yet to attain the kind of detachment that is necessary for that kind of thing. I've been swept off my feet, and I just want to enjoy that for a little while longer.

Wow.
decemberthirty: (Default)
2004-02-12 06:08 pm

(no subject)

I'm still trying to catch up to what I'm currently reading, but I'm almost there. After finishing Written on the Body, I read Changing Planes by Ursula K. LeGuin. I found it to be a bit of a disappointment. The idea of being able to visit different planes of existence while waiting for you plane in an airport is clever, but I didn't find the results to be particularly special. The stories read like little travelogues or anthropologists' reports about the different planes. Much of LeGuin's writing has something of an extraterrestrial anthropological bent to it, but she usually does a better job of mixing that in with an engrossing story. LeGuin is so good at creating characters that I thought it was a shame that almost none of these stories had strong characters to revolve around. It's entirely possible, however, that I wouldn't be nearly so disappointed by this book if I hadn't just read the wonderful Birthday of the World.

And now, without further ado, I will tell you what I am currently reading. It's The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay by Michael Chabon. What a fantastic book. If I could make my book half so heartbreaking, I will die happy. I don't think I'm going to be able to very coherent about the book right now, because I'm still in the middle of it, and all I can think is, "Oh, Sammy! Oh, Joe! I love you both so much..." But I am particularly in love with Sammy. His story is just heartbreakingly tender and sweet, and then full of so much painful and unnecessary self-denial. That kind of thing is right up my alley. I will post more once I finish it, but all I can say right now is that the book is amazing!