decemberthirty: (starfruit)
Not last night but the night before, twenty naked robbers came knocking at my door. Oh, no, wait, that’s not what happened. What happened was that I finished David Mitchell’s Ghostwritten. Less exciting than naked robbers, perhaps, but the naked robbers might have freaked me out, so it’s probably for the best.

Ahem.

Ghostwritten is a globe-hopping collection of interrelated narratives. Mitchell chooses a group of disparate characters—a member of a doomsday cult in Okinawa, a clerk in a Tokyo record shop, a businessman engaged in some shady money-laundering schemes in Hong Kong, an art thief in Petersburg, a disembodied spirit in Mongolia, a fugitive physicist on a remote island in Ireland, a late-night radio dj in New York, etc—and spends a little time with each of them, getting to know them, outlining their lives, and finding the ways that their lives connect to and influence each other.

Before I read this book, someone (I think it may have been [livejournal.com profile] hells_librarian) described it to me as a “practice exercise for Cloud Atlas,” and I think that description is quite accurate. The similarities were striking enough that I spend the first half of Ghostwritten waiting for someone with a comet-shaped birthmark to appear. (She did, in the seventh of the book’s nine sections. A couple of Cloud Atlas characters made brief appearances here as well.) As in Cloud Atlas, Mitchell makes great use of his chameleon-like narrative voice. He writes about each of his varied characters in the first person, and he does a remarkable job of matching his tone and style to the personalities, nationalities, and idiosyncrasies of each of his narrators. Also like Cloud Atlas, much of the fun of this book comes from spotting the connections both small and large that link the different sections of the book to each other.

In the beginning of the book those connections seemed quite minor, nothing more than the incidental brushings of one life against another that happen to all of us every day: the cultist mistakenly calling the record-shop clerk when trying to reach his leader; the clerk thinking it’s a strange wrong number and hanging up. As the book goes on, however, the connections begin to build both in number and significance, and it becomes clear that Mitchell is trying to get at something much larger than the early chance encounters. The network of links eventually became complicated enough that I drew a chart in an attempt to diagram it all. I wish I had a scanner so that I could show you folks the mess I made with names jotted down all over the page and arrows pointing every which way—that would be the best way to convey the complexity of the book. Unfortunately, I liked the book better in the early sections. The later parts of the book were fun because of all the “Aha!” moments that came as I uncovered more and more links, but I found Mitchell’s musings on chance and free will and the fate of the world to be a bit on the grandiose side. I would have liked the book better if it had been content as a study of the ways people’s paths cross each other without their knowledge.

The bottom line is that Ghostwritten is a fun and very well-written book. It’s an intriguing read, but Cloud Atlas covers similar territory in a more accomplished fashion. I have Black Swan Green sitting at home and I’m anxious to read it just to see what Mitchell can do when he goes in an entirely different direction.

I’m fascinated to see what my book club will have to say about this book at our meeting. It’s quite different from anything else we’ve read, and I wonder what they’ll make of it.

I’m now reading The Swimming-Pool Library by Alan Hollinghurst, which, from the early going, appears to be about sex, sex, sex. And some more sex. And gay sex. And maybe a little bit of architecture, and then some more sex. The synopsis on the back called it “darkly erotic” and I guess they weren’t kidding!
decemberthirty: (Default)
I finished Cloud Atlas this morning, and now I'm faced with the dilemma of how to write about the book without giving too much of it away to those who may read it (and you should read it--it's fascinating). This is more difficult than it usually is because the suspense in Cloud Atlas comes not just from the plot (or, more accurately, plots), but from the structure of the book itself. It's an interesting case, and certainly one of the most unique books I've read in quite a while. I enjoyed the first half better than the second; waiting to see how the structure of the book would play out was more fun than reading it once I knew how the book worked. That's not to say that the second half wasn't enjoyable--Mitchell is not only good at clever gimmicks, he's also perfectly capable of holding my interest by traditional means like character and plot.

I won't be revealing too much if I say that the book is composed of six storylines, each completely distinct from each other yet connected in myriad ways. These connections are both large and thematic, such as the overarching concerns with time and the way humans' record-keeping survives into and influences times beyond those imagined by the record-keeper, and small and incidental, such as the comet-shaped birthmark that appears on several of the characters. I loved finding these connections, and I loved the way the different stories looped and rippled through each other. Some of the stories worked better than others, of course. I loved Robert Frobisher, like I said before, and the second half of his story was at least as good as the first. Sonmi-451's chapters were wonderful--the closest I've come in years to reading hard sci-fi, and a reminder of just how much a talented writer can do with the genre. "Sloosha's Crossing" was probably the story that resonated the most with me, which might say something for the value of continuity in storytelling. Timothy Cavendish and his ghastly ordeal, on the other hand, had moments of humor but failed to appeal to me, and I was only moderately interested in Adam Ewing's chapters. (I should note that it's entirely possible that this fluctuation has more to do with my particular tastes than with any real inconsistency in the quality of the book.) Despite the fact that I liked some of the plots more than others, I loved the way they meshed, the way they moved through time, and the way they seemed to come full circle, the earliest story connecting to the one set farthest into the future. But the thing I loved most, sap that I am, was the way the essence of the book seemed to be a message of hope: the peaceful spirit of the Moriori, encountered by Adam Ewing on his 19th century Polynesian voyage, will survive through our modern society, through the horrible, dystopic future of "Sonmi-451", and be reborn in the post-apocalyptic Valleysmen of "Sloosha's Crossing." Not without struggle, not without suffering through unpleasant times and deadly times, not without massive destruction and slow, difficult rebuilding, yet it will survive.
decemberthirty: (Default)
I am really enjoying Cloud Atlas so far. I haven't read a whole lot of it, but what I have read has been a lot of fun. I knew almost nothing about the book before I started reading it--just that it was composed of several sections that all seem very different but somehow relate to each other in the end. I've only read a section and a half, but it's enough for me to say that David Mitchell is a fantastic mimic; I love the way he's able to adopt different styles so effortlessly in his different sections. It makes me quite eager to see what he will do next.

I think it also helps that I'm finding Robert Frobisher to be such an appealing character. He reminds me a little bit of Billy Prior; he lives in roughly the same era, after all, and shares Billy's heightened awareness of class, and his slangy flippancy that conceals secret emotions, and his willingness to fuck anything that moves... And of course I love Billy, so anything that reminds me of him is always a good thing. (Sigh. Why do I always fall for the fucked up ones? Billy Prior, and Rai, and Sammy Clay, and Peter from The Centaur, and now Frobisher... Ridiculous. Fortunately I don't do this in real life!)

Anyway, Cloud Atlas. I like the way that both of the sections I've read so far have presented their narratives in an entirely one-sided way, the first section through Ewing's journal and the second through Frobisher's letters to his friend and accomplice (and lover? or former lover?) Sixsmith. You only see the characters as they choose to present themselves, which adds just enough unreliability to make things fun. I also love the fact that Ewing's journal showed up in Frobisher's section, that Frobisher found part of it on a bookshelf and read just as much of the journal as we get to read. It makes me think that perhaps the book is like one of those Russian nesting dolls, with each bit of narrative fitting inside the next in the same way. Frobisher has found and read the written record of his life that Ewing left behind, and in the next section someone will find and read Frobisher's remaining correspondence. Of course I'm not sure that the book will turn out that way, but I think it would be fascinating if it did.
Page generated May. 31st, 2025 11:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios