(no subject)
Mar. 5th, 2004 12:51 pmI finished Cavedweller a day or two ago, and it was a total disappointment. The beginning of the book had great narrative drive, but that all seemed to disappear by the time I was about a third of the way in. The driving conflict behind the first part of the story (Delia's desire to get her daughters back), was resolved when there were still hundreds of pages left in the book, and I don't think that Dorothy Allison ever managed find a compelling reason for writing the rest of those hundred of pages. She got very tangled up in her characters' lives, but not in a way that was particularly cohesive or compelling for me as the reader. I also had a big problem with the sense of time in the book. I couldn't ever seem to get a handle on how much time had passed between one episode and the next, and throughout the book I lacked a definitive sense of the ages of the characters, which made it harder for me to identify with them. Things came together a little bit near the end, but the middle just got so horribly bogged down! It was full of episodes of which I could not see the significance, and narratives that I couldn't figure out where they were going. All in all, it seemed to me to be the kind of situation where a writer puts out a critically acclaimed and massively popular first novel (i.e. Bastard Out of Carolina), and then editors become unwilling to criticize or direct the author's subsequent work.
After finished Cavedweller, I was out of new reading material, so I decided to reread The Eye in the Door by Pat Barker. I reread Regeneration shortly after finishing my own novel, and of course it was wonderful, but I didn't react anywhere near as strongly as I'm reacting to The Eye. I think it's because I'm much more familiar with Regeneration. It was my third time reading it, and I listened to it as a book-on-tape a year or two ago. Eye is much less familiar, and as I'm reading it, I'm very surprised by how much of the plot I seem to have forgotten. I think that the only other time I read it was when I was stuck in Gatwick for nearly a whole day after missing my flight to Switzerland, and I read the book almost in one sitting. So it stands to reason that I would have forgotten a lot of the details. I tend to whenever I devour a book in that way. And now, of course, I'm devouring it again. But I can't help it. It's more of those men, those repressed and yearning men that never fail to break my heart. Just like Sammy Clay, Rivers and Sassoon and the rest are forced into that state of tortured, unexpressed self-denial that I'm such a sucker for. Oh, they break my heart!
After finished Cavedweller, I was out of new reading material, so I decided to reread The Eye in the Door by Pat Barker. I reread Regeneration shortly after finishing my own novel, and of course it was wonderful, but I didn't react anywhere near as strongly as I'm reacting to The Eye. I think it's because I'm much more familiar with Regeneration. It was my third time reading it, and I listened to it as a book-on-tape a year or two ago. Eye is much less familiar, and as I'm reading it, I'm very surprised by how much of the plot I seem to have forgotten. I think that the only other time I read it was when I was stuck in Gatwick for nearly a whole day after missing my flight to Switzerland, and I read the book almost in one sitting. So it stands to reason that I would have forgotten a lot of the details. I tend to whenever I devour a book in that way. And now, of course, I'm devouring it again. But I can't help it. It's more of those men, those repressed and yearning men that never fail to break my heart. Just like Sammy Clay, Rivers and Sassoon and the rest are forced into that state of tortured, unexpressed self-denial that I'm such a sucker for. Oh, they break my heart!